Please note our new postal address when sending
contributions to the legal fund:
121 5th Avenue, PMB #150
Brooklyn, New York 11217
About DDDB
Our coalition consists of 21 community organizations and
there are 51 community organizations formally
aligned in opposition to the Ratner plan.
DDDB is a volunteer-run organization. We have over 5,000
subscribers to our email newsletter, and 7,000 petition
signers. Over 800 volunteers have registered with DDDB
to form our various teams, task-forces and committees
and we have over 150 block captains. We have a 20 person
volunteer legal team of local lawyers supplementing our
retained attorneys.
We are funded entirely by individual donations from the community at large
and through various fundraising events we and supporters have organized.
We have the financial support of well over 3,500 individual
donors.
...Mr. Ratner managed to break ground on the basketball arena – which will be home to the Brooklyn Nets – in 2010, just before tax free bonds the state had permitted him to issue in order to finance the arena's construction at below-market interest rates were due to expire. The timeline for other components of the project, including the construction of three residential towers that will hug the arena, is less clear.
"I think we'll break ground sometime this year," was all Mr. Ratner would say, referring to the first residential building that is slated to rise at the site, a tower on the corner of Dean and Flatbush whose base will cantilever over a rear entrance to the 14,000 seat Barlcays Center. The first building will be something of a barometer, Mr. Ratner suggested. The offerings in the other two buildings, he said, be they studios, one bedrooms, or larger apartments, will be based off the market's reception of the spaces that Forest City Ratner will offer in the first tower. (Emphasis added.)
Last year he thought they'd break ground...last year.
Mr. Ratner bristled when asked to make further reaching projections of progress on the Atlantic Yards site. Standing inside the arena and gazing into its nearly finished bowl of seats, The Commercial Observer's gaze couldn't help but trail farther, through a large entryway being used by construction vehicles. Beyond was the rest of the site, a stretch of train tracks and dirt recessed below grade that runs east for several blocks between Atlantic Avenue and Pacific Street.
"We're here to talk about the arena," Mr. Ratner snapped when asked when those portions of the development would begin.
(Emphasis added.)
Such petulance just because a friendly publication's reporter was attempting to dig a wee tiny bit and perhaps broke the restrictions of Mr. Ratner's narrow interview ground rules? Of course Mr. Ratner wouldn't want to talk about anything besides the arena...because there is nothing to say about any of the rest of the phantom project
One could forgive Mr. Ratner's edginess given the opposition he has faced. Sensing that he had perhaps recoiled a little too fiercely, his demeanor quickly loosened.
One could but one shouldn't. Why? Because this guy has broken every meaningful promise he has made to the public.
"You have to understand, my words have been twisted around in the past," Mr. Ratner said.
"And then all of a sudden I'm getting sued," he added, seeming to refer to a recent suit by a group of workers who claim they were promised union jobs by Forest City Ratner for enrolling in a training program, but subsequently weren't offered employment.
It is an odd presumption the reporter has made, that Ratner was talking about that suit. Because neither that suit nor any others were filed becuase of "twisted words." We'd actually like to present a challenge to Mr. Ratner and The Commercial Observer to show us one instance of his words being twisted and one instance of them being twisted and leading to a lawsuit. His words haven't been twisted, they are twisted, e.g. "Why should people get to see plans? This isn't a public project."
...Mr. Ratner also pointed out that games will be partially visible from the plaza in front of the arena.
"It's going to be the only court in the league where you can literally watch the game from the street outside," Mr. Ratner said, pointing out the arena's embrace of the surrounding community.
(Emphasis added.)
If by "embrace" Mr. Ratner means dropping a rusty behemoth in the midst of a neighborhood with a massive traffic and parking problem, with no meaningufl mitigation or management plans, and opening it to 18,000 people 230-or-so nights per year...well, we'll have to reject that hug. An air-kiss would have been preferable.
Posted: 2.01.12
Alleged Sexual Harassment by Former Ratner SVP Jim Stuckey Leads to Lawsuit Against NYU
The Daily News is reporting (and Norman Oder elaborating) that a former administrator at NYU's Schack Institute for Real Estate is suing the university for firing here when she accused former Dean and former Atlantic Yards front man Jim Stuckey of sexual harassment. Remember, the NY Post reported months ago when Stuckey was unceremoniously resigned from his NYU deanship that the former Ratner SVP had been forced out there because of sexual harassment accusations.
So, what did NYU know about Stuckey when they hired him
and did Bruce Ratner's position on the Schack board have anything to do with the hiring? And what will this former NYU administrator, now suing the school, reveal about Stuckey's hiring in her legal briefs?
Is it any wonder at all that the man who felt so entitled to take an entire neighborhood would allegedly feel entitled to his work place subordinate?
A NEW York University administrator charged the school Wednesday with eliminating her job when she accused a dean of sexual harassment.
Stephanie Bonadio, 34, once a rising star in NYU's Schack Institute for Real Estate, claims her career was ruined when she accused her boss of forcing himself on her.
In the Manhattan Supreme Court suit, Bonadio says she was having dinner at the Strip House restaurant on E. 12th St. with James Stuckey, then dean of the Schack Institute for Real Estate, when he tried to get her to perform a sex act.
As she asked about her pending promotion,"He grabbed her hand and ...without her consent, he forcibly placed her hand on his crotch and his erect penis," the suit charges.
She said she told Stuckey "she was not that kind of girl."
Soon after Bonadio reported the incident, Stuckey, a former executive with Forest City Ratner and ex-head of Mayor Bloomberg's commission on design, resigned "for health reasons," the suit says.
NYU denied to the Daily News that the firing was retaliation. Both Stuckey and Bonadio did not comment for the article.
2. If New York had this Florida law and implemented it at least Atlantic Yards would actually provide some form of housing, which it currently is not doing at all:
Could the new Marlins ballpark or the Tampa Bay Rays' Tropicana Field serve as a homeless shelter for the 270 or so nights a year that they're not used for baseball?
If two Florida lawmakers have their way, they might. As reported by the Miami Herald, state legislators have unearthed an obscure law that has not been enforced since it was adopted in 1988. It states that any ballpark or stadium that receives taxpayer money shall serve as a homeless shelter on the dates that it is not in use.
Now, a new bill would punish owners of teams who play in publicly funded stadiums if they don't provide a haven for the homeless. Affected ballparks would include the Miami Marlins' new ballpark in Miami's Little Havana, the Tampa Bay Rays' Tropicana Field in St. Petersburg and several spring training facilities. It also includes the homes of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, Tampa Bay Lightning, Miami Heat, Jacksonville Jaguars and Florida Panthers.
The newspaper estimates that owners might have to return $30 million in benefits that were already bestowed if the bill passes and they can't prove they were running homeless shelters (to the newspaper's knowledge, no teams have been).
Senate Bill 816, which would make teams and stadium owners return millions of taxpayer dollars if they can't prove that they've been operating as a haven for the homeless on non-event nights, passed its first committee in the Senate on Monday with a unanimous vote.
"We have spent over $300 million supporting teams that can afford to pay a guy $7, $8, $10 million a year to throw a baseball 90 feet. I think they can pay for their own stadium," said Sen. Michael Bennett, R-Bradenton, who is sponsoring the bill. "I can not believe that we're going to cut money out of Medicaid and take it away from the homeless and take it away from the poor and impoverished, and we're continuing to support people who are billionaires."
With this being an election year, it's not too much of a surprise that state lawmakers might find a headline-grabbing way to show that they're concerned about the rights of the little people. And what better target than professional sports, where exorbitant salaries and construction costs are printed in the newspaper every day?
I don't suspect that this bill will pass, though. The rich folk behind the ballparks have way too much lobbying power. The homeless advocacy does not. It's simple math...
Oral argument on NY State's and the developer's appeal of the ruling that went against them in DDDB et al. v. ESDC et al. has been scheduled for....Tuesday, February 14th at 2pm in the Appellate Division of New York State Supreme Court (27 Madison Avenue in Manhattan.)
What better day to further discuss, in court, the sweetness of Bruce Ratner's sweetheart deal.
Earlier this week The Nation's sports editor David Zirin first tweeted his invitation to Atlantic Yards investor, Bruce Ratner brother and President of the Center for Constitional Rights Michael Ratner to co-host a screening and town hall discussion of Battle for Brooklyn. Now he has posted a column (longer than 140 characters) on The Nation's website, making clearer the reason for and sincerity of his invitation:
Is Atlantic Yards Good for Brooklyn? A Public Call to Host a Town Hall Meeting With Michael Ratner
As reported by Michael O’Keeffe in yesterday’s New York Daily News, I have issued a formal request to Michael Ratner of the Center for Constitutional Rights to co-host a film screening of the documentary Battle for Brooklyn. The documentary describes the efforts in Brooklyn to resist the Atlantic Yards basketball arena/housing development project, which will upturn twenty-two acres in the heart of the borough. That has meant protesting eminent domain evictions, sweetheart backroom deals, the prospect of acerlated gentrification, the tearing down of historic buildings and the use of taxpayer subsidies. Mr. Ratner is an investor in this project, spearheaded by his brother, Bruce Ratner, a high powered real estate magnate. Michael Ratner is also a hero of mine. His work opposing the Patriot Act, torture as policy, and the War Powers Act is an inspiration to anyone who cares about civil liberties and real freedom. In other words, not freedom the way Mitt Romney or Newt Gingrich or Ron Paul talk about freedom—the freedom to destroy the environment, smash unions, or build a pipeline through your backyard—but the freedom to actually assemble, debate, discuss and live in an open society.
But Michael Ratner is also an investor in this incredibly controversial project. He has never commented publicly about the constitutionality of how eminent domain was used to remove people from their Brooklyn homes and businesses. He has never explained why someone of his sterling reputation would involve himself in a project that symbolizes for so many residents the profits of the few over the needs of the many. Maybe he believes that this kind of massive development project is completely constitutional. Maybe he thinks that it’s in the best interests of Brooklyn. Maybe he believes that the Ratner family will profit mightily from the project, which will in turn support the good works of the CCR. I have no idea. As a boy with Brooklyn roots, I’m certainly open to his arguments, but it would be good to actually hear them. Given Michael Ratner’s profile as a civil libertarian, I honestly believe he has an obligation to be public and transparent about his involvement
That is why I am issuing the following offer to Mr. Ratner: let us co-host a showing of the documentary Battle for Brooklyn. The film, which was shortlisted for an Academy Award, is remarkably gripping and would provide a terrific basis for a townhall conversation about the merits of Atlantic Yards, the constitutionality of eminent domain for private benefit and whether sports arenas are answers to the vexing problems of urban development and job creation. I already have agreements secured from several movie theaters willing to host such an event as well as a commitment from Daniel Goldstein, the protagonist of Battle for Brooklyn, to attend. You and I can both make brief statements and then open it up to the crowd. To Mr. Ratner: I can be reached at dave@edgeofsports.com. Let’s hold this event soon, in a comradely amicable setting, that allows us all to clear the air and educate the public about whether Atlantic Yards is in the best interests of Brooklyn not to mention in accordance with the kind of free, open and just society you have spent a lifetime championing.
How many affordable apartments would there be for low-income families--families that need two bedrooms or more--in B2, the first planned Atlantic Yards tower?
The building, which has been delayed nearly two years and has not yet broken ground, would include 130 studios, 180 one-bedroom, and 40 two-bedrooms.
Of those latter 40 units, 20 would be subsidized. However, only eight of them would be low-income, with monthly rents at $701.75 and $902.25, at least under current income guidelines.
The other subsidized "affordable" two-bedroom units--four each--would cost $1604, $2406, and $3007. It makes you wonder how much the market-rate units would go for.
Reneging on the pledge
Why so few larger units? For the first building, Forest City Ratner has reneged on its long-promised "goal" to ensure than half the affordable housing--on a square foot basis--would be two- and three-bedroom apartments.
And that was a key selling point to struggling families hoping for better housing, as noted in the screenshot at [right], from the original AtlanticYards.com web site.
Note that the web site misleadingly implied that half the number of units--rather than square footage--would be larger units...
Betsy Gotbaum the former toothless NYC Public Advocate and perhaps the most ineffectual elected official in world history has penned a ludicrous Timesletter to the editor in defense of her chum Bruce Ratner afterTimes columnist Michael Powell last week had the temerity to point out the developer is involved in two federal indictments. Powell wrote, "The Brooklyn and Yonkers cases are not simply about wayward politicians. The cases share an intriguing tie to the developer Bruce Ratner, who in project after project deploys lobbyists and politicians to change zoning ordinances and chase down rich packets of subsidies."
Powell then wonders aloud how Ratner, whose development firm and chief lobbyist Bruce Bender are clearly at the center of and the beneficiary of the Yonkers Ridge Hill bribe(s) that led to the indictments that go to trial in the coming weeks, has managed to walk "between the legal raindrops."
How dare he, this Powell, is the summation of the former Public Advocate's letter. We have no idea what Gotbaum was up to as Public Advocate (though she said she opposed eminent domain she supported Atlantic Yards because the developer, her trusted friend, told her he "would not use eminent domain"), and we certainly don't know what she has been up to since, but clearly she has at the very least continued to schmooze with chums such as Bruce Ratner. We don't remember her doing any meaningful public advocacy as Public Advocate but she sure hopped to it as Ratner Advocate when Ratner called.
We can imagine the phone calls Bruce made after Powell's column:
Betsy? It's Bruce. Did you see how nasty that Powell guy was to me in the paper? Could you...er, maybe, write a letter to the editor?
Sure Bruce. But just want to make sure, did you do anything wrong?
Nope. Thanks Bets! Any chance you could get Mayor Bloo—
Don't push it Bruce.
Wouldn't it be fascinating to see the list of those chums of Bruce's who were wise enough not to oblige him?
I disagree with Michael Powell ("A Developer Between Legal Clouds," Gotham column, Jan. 10) that two bribery investigations with ties to the developer Bruce Ratner and his company, Forest City Ratner, suggest misdeeds on his part.
More important, the professional investigators have not found that the company or its employees behaved in an illegal manner.
While I do agree that we have an unprecedented amount of corruption among elected officials, lobbyists and others, you cannot and should not assume that a developer is guilty of the same behavior because, well, he's a developer.
As a former New York City public advocate and during many years in public service, I have had the honor to work with Mr. Ratner. He has always demonstrated the highest ethical standards and behavior. As consumer affairs commissioner and as a developer, he has worked to improve the city and help those with greatest needs.
BETSY GOTBAUM
New York, Jan. 11, 2012
Oh, professional investigators haven't found Ratner behaving in an "illegal manner?" That must mean Ratner Ratner has the "highest ethical standards." And since Ratner's firm is the beneficiary of the bribe at the heart of the Ridge Hill indictment—yet only the briber who received a no-show job with Forest City after the bribee city councilwoman flipped her no vote and the bribee have been indicted—perhaps the former Public Advocate would understand that maybe, just maybe, the "professional" investigators got Bruce Bender to speak in order to indict the Yonkers councilwoman and/or that there just wasn't enough evidence to indict Bender and/or federal prosecutors prefer nabbing the politicians over the connected developers. But we are not surprised that the former Public Advocate with subpoena powers who never issued a single subpoena isn't exactly the sharpest legal beagle in the kennel.
As for Bruce Ratner's ethical standards we could spend all day transcribing a litany of his unethical behavior but we won't. We'll just point to the latest one in the press, the fact that years after promised Ratner has not hired an independent compliance monitor (ICM) to hold the developer accountable for the commitments he made in the "Community Benefit Agreement" which including the hiring of that monitor.
It was that noted ethicist Bruce Ratner who said in 2007, "Atlantic Yards is setting a new standard for inclusion and community involvement for a development, and the ICM will be everyone's watchdog to ensure we reach all of the goals and benefits we have agreed to in the CBA."
As for working "to improve the city and help those with greatest needs," Gotbaum must have different definitions for those words than conventionally held. Is a billion dollar money-losing arena surrounded by a once thriving now demolished neighborhood and future parking lots in the middle of housing crisis an improvement for the city and helpful to those with the greatest needs? Only if one consider's Ratner to be the one with those greatest needs.
Finally, Gotbaum wrote, "While I do agree that we have an unprecedented amount of corruption among elected officials, lobbyists and others, you cannot and should not assume that a developer is guilty of the same behavior because, well, he's a developer. "
Does she not realize that the corruption plaguing politicians, lobbyists and others is frequently in the service of developers such as Ratner? Of course she does. But one should not assume that just because one is called a Public Advocate doesn't mean that one is doing public advocacy.
To come out of the woodwork to defend the ethics of one of the most ethically challenged developers around is just plain astounding...but its what you do for an ol' chum.
Posted: 1.18.12
New York State's Atlantic Yards Appeal Briefs Dissected by Norman Oder
Norman Oder takes a long look at New York State's briefs on appeal of the Supreme Court ruling that requires the Empire State Development Corporation to undertake a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement. ESDC argues that the court usurped agency discretion. The ESDC certainly knows a thing or two about usurpation, such as usurping all NYC zoning laws and 22 acres of Brooklyn to construct a money-losing arena and massive parking lots for a politically connected developer.
But we digress. The plaintiffs on the case, which include DDDB, have made clear, and the court agreed, that the ESDC acted arbitrarily and capriciously in its decision making "process":
The battle over the last remaining Atlantic Yards lawsuit continues in court, with new briefs from the Empire State Development Corporation (ESDC) and developer Forest City Ratner.
The state agency, decrying an "unprecedented judicial usurpation of agency discretion," slams state Supreme Court Justice Marcy Friedman for imposing what it says are her views on how to analyze the potential impact of an extended project buildout lasting 25 years, rather than the officially announced ten years.
Similarly, Forest City denounces "an unprecedented expansion and distortion of SEQRA [State Environmental Quality Review Act], and an improper substitution by the court of its judgment for that of ESDC."
Thus, contends the agency, her decision, which required the ESDC to conduct a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) regarding Phase 2--the eleven towers outside the arena block and Site 5--should be reversed both because judges should defer to agency decisions, as well as "the record here, which makes clear that ESDC took multiple SEQRA 'hard looks' at the impacts of the Project under various construction schedules."
The briefs by ESDC and Forest Citywill get a response from the two coalitions (led by Develop Don't Destroy Brooklyn and the Prospect Heights Neighborhood Development Council/BrooklynSpeaks) that brought the (now-combined) lawsuit.
The twist
But the whole thing's a bit surreal.
Why? Because statements made outside the record by developer Bruce Ratner make a mockery of the agency's longstanding claims the project would last ten years. Moreover, a regular pattern of construction-related abuses means that the mitigation plan created by and cited by the state is less "robust" than asserted. ...
The Times Connects The Dots on Two Federal Corruption Cases Involving Forest City Ratner
Nearly two years ago when Forest City Ratner was named as what appeared to be an unindicted co-conspirator in a federal bribery and corruption indictment concerning the developer's Ridge Hill project there was much wondering, here and here, about how it was that Forest City, as The Times puts it today, walked between the legal raindrops.
And while we appreciate Michael Powell's column raising those questions and connecting those dots in yesterday's paper, we do wonder why it has taken two years to connect those dots. What dots?
...Last week, the lobbyist Richard Lipsky stood in a courtroom to acknowledge bribe-making. His partner in crime, Carl Kruger, the former state senator and a Brooklyn Democrat, had taken his tear-soaked turn two weeks earlier. They face years in prison.
A few weeks from now, in the same courthouse, a Democratic Yonkers councilwoman and her cousin, the city's Republican Party chairman, are expected to stand trial. They are accused of bribery, extortion and tax evasion.
The Brooklyn and Yonkers cases are not simply about wayward politicians. The cases share an intriguing tie to the developer Bruce Ratner, who in project after project deploys lobbyists and politicians to change zoning ordinances and chase down rich packets of subsidies.
I should emphasize that Mr. Ratner has walked between the legal raindrops. Federal prosecutors have not implicated him or his company, Forest City Ratner, in either of these corruption cases.
But he figures prominently enough that the indictments identify him as "Developer No. 1" in Brooklyn and "Developer No. 2" in Yonkers. In Brooklyn, he has pushed the 22-acre Atlantic Yards development, including an arena and residential towers. Forest City Ratner was the development partner for the headquarters of The New York Times Company.
Mr. Ratner has a political maestro's touch. His vice president, Bruce Bender, is a stalwart of the Democratic Party's powerful Thomas Jefferson Club in south Brooklyn. Its members — Mr. Kruger, Councilman Lewis A. Fidler and State Senator John L. Sampson — quickly championed this project.
Mr. Bender was a hound to the chase after public subsidies. In 2009, the city's Independent Budget Office concluded that the arena deal would cost the city $40 million more than it would generate in tax revenue over 30 years.
Mr. Ratner, by contrast, would haul in $726 million in special public benefits.
Now comes the really intriguing part about who put the briber up to bribing the bribee and where did the briber get the money to bribe the bribee:
The Yonkers case has received less attention, yet raises perhaps more troubling questions. On a hilltop on the northern edge of Yonkers, Mr. Ratner wanted to build an 81-acre luxury mall and housing complex called Ridge Hill.
But surrounding towns feared snarls of traffic, and the county planning board voted the project down in 2005.
Mr. Ratner had a patented response. He hired the former counsel to a powerful Yonkers politician as well as the city's Republican chairman, Zehy Jereis. And Assemblyman Michael Spano of Yonkers resigned his seat to take a job in the lobbying firm Patricia Lynch & Associates. Ms. Lynch was former top aide to the Assembly speaker, Sheldon Silver, and, as chance would have it, an Albany lobbyist for Forest City Ratner.
Mr. Spano now is mayor of Yonkers.
Yet for all this, Mr. Ratner found himself in a bind in 2006. He lacked the votes to overturn the planning board. Sandy Annabi, the Democratic council leader, stood as his most outspoken opponent.
ACCORDING to the federal indictment, these machinations revived the Ridge Hill project:
On June 2, 2006, Mr. Jereis, the Yonkers Republican chairman, met with a Ratner official at a restaurant. A week later, Mr. Jereis brought along his cousin, Ms. Annabi, to chat with the official.
Five days later, Ms. Annabi announced she would support Ridge Hill. (Mr. Ratner's shop drafted the news release for her.) Mr. Ratner agreed to hire Mr. Jereis as a consultant for his company, once Ms. Annabi voted yes.
The City Council approved the zoning change on July 11, 2006.
Three months later, Mr. Jereis signed a $5,000-per-month consulting contract with Mr. Ratner.
In January 2010, federal prosecutors accused Ms. Annabi of selling her vote "for baubles and trinkets" and indicted her, and Mr. Jereis.
So many questions remain, not the least of which is where the money came from. Prosecutors say Mr. Jereis gave Ms. Annabi a $160,000 shower of bribes.
Back in Brooklyn, similar questions remain. Mr. Lipsky shared $252,000 worth of his lobbying fees with Mr. Kruger; the source of that money is unclear...
(Emphasis added.)
When the Ridge Hill trial starts it will be fascinating to see what comes light regarding Forest City Ratner's (and most likely Bruce Bender's) role in the bribery scheme.
The New Jersey Nets, once again, are stinking up the joint and the Barclays Center arena is in jeopardy of being facadeless come projected completion in September 2012 now that the custom manufacterer of the rusty panels has gone belly up.
First the Nets (at 1-5 they hold the second worst record in the league), from the Times:
When the two worst-shooting teams in the N.B.A. got together Monday night, the Nets played down to their standing and fell to the Indiana Pacers, 108-94.
The Pacers, who shot 53 percent to the Nets' 37 percent, also made 13 of 21 3-point attempts. If sinking shots — and the Nets' hopes — seemed like no contest for the Pacers, it was because most of the 3-point attempts were not contested.
"We just didn't do a good job of running them off the 3-point line, of paying attention to details," Deron Williams said...
Again.
Will the arena in Brooklyn be ready when the semi-pro Nets are ready to move? That is now a question worthy of a "no comment" from Forest City Ratner. Norman Oder (followed by the NY Observer) reports:
The Whitestown, IN-based company that has been fabricating the weathered steel for the Barclays Center facade unexpectedly went out of business last week, raising questions about whether and when the additional steel needed would be delivered, and how the overall project timetable may be affected.
It's unclear how much of the steel has been fabricated and delivered by ASI Limited, but a considerable amount of facade work remains to be done. ...
A spokesman for developer Forest City Ratner said "we cannot comment at this time." The Empire State Development (ESD), the state agency overseeing Atlantic Yards, said it was a question for Forest City...
Posted: 1.03.12
Token Mets Owners vs. Nets "Owner" Jay-Z Today The New York Times, in a tongue-in-cheek (borderline sneering) manner, takes a look at the financially strapped New York Mets' effort to sell off $20 million shares of the team to minority owners who will have no say in the franchise's development but will receive perks such as access to the Mets' mascot Mr. Met and a parking spot at CitiField. For its story The Times obtained a term sheet given by the Mets' owners to prospective partners.
According to The Times a $20 milllion share represents about 4% of the team (our calculations peg it at about 2.6%).
What's this have to do with Atlantic Yards? Well "cultural icon" Jay-Z is a less than 1% owner of the New Jersey Nets, paying roughly $4.5 million for the right to be out front of the team's marketing campaigns. Yet one would believe from the media coverage (including The Times) and the Nets public relations strategy that he owns a substantial portion of the team. Or, as Norman Oder put it in a Salon article, "He's become the face of the franchise, the Teflon-coated superstar employed by his partners to distract attention from the hardball politics, sweetheart deals and private profits behind the arena and the rest of the 16-tower project."
The press has taken Jay-Z's figurehead ownership and inflated it to such an extent as to suggest that the rapper is making franchise decisions (see the LeBron James free agency saga), when in reality those decisions are made primarily by the Russian oligarch Mikhail Prokhorov and his management team, with an assist from Nets CEO and PR huckster Brett Yormark.
We doubt very much that The Times or any other news outlet will ever even divulge the names of the $20 million Mets shareholders, let alone make a single one of them the face of the franchise. Yet the focus on Jay-Z as a Nets owner will not end unless he sells his small share.
So $20 million to the Mets affords the investor the booby prize of getting to hang with the Mets' mascot. With the Nets, $4.5 million makes you the owner, at least in the eyes of the celebrity-obsessed press.
Posted: 12.21.11
Marty Markowitz Spreads Holiday Cheer With Bogus Blame and Divisiveness
If the folks who supported Atlantic Yards, such as its biggest (as in loudest) cheerleader Marty Markowitz, hadn't attempted to construct the largest single-developer project in NYC history by overriding local zoning, bypassing the votes of all city and state elected officials, utilizing eminent domain for private gain, giving away public assets through sweetheart deals, providing special deals and subsidies totaling somewhere near $2 billion, and breaking housing and jobs promises left and right all while ignoring community input without ever sincerely seeking it, perhaps Atlantic Yards would not be the most reviled development plan in all of New York.
And now, despite all of that plus the growing realization among the non-partisans that the project and its one accomplishment—a money-losing arena—is a clustermess in the heart of Brooklyn, the Borough President is sticking to the absurd line that it is the community advocates' fault the project is a failure. Taking it yet one step further Markowitz astonishingly claims that the use of eminent domain for Bruce Ratner and Mikhail Prokhorov's benefit was somehow a good thing.
Why do we bring all of this up? Well just look at what holiday cheer Markowitz is spreading:
I had the opportunity to interview, Brooklyn Borough President Marty Markowitz. Here are some of his views, on the issues of the day. Below the quotes, is the audio of the interview. ...
Atlantic Yards
"If the folks that opposed this, hadn't tied the project up for 7 years in litigation Atlantic Yards a good piece of it would've built. The affordable housing would've been on it's way. The Nets would be playing in the arena and defeating the Manhattan Knicks."
"The folks that were impacted by eminent domain, overwhelmingly most of them did very well. The folks that are the loudest complainers, folks could argue are the gentrifiers."
"I have significant reservations about permit parking, about resident parking only, I don't think it could work."
Markowitz can say whatever he wants and continue to place false blame whereever he wants but the "failure" of Atlantic Yards is that it was never feasible as promoted and approved. Who says? His buddy Bruce Ratner says.
But now, the man who benefitted greatly from New York State's controversial eminent domain condemnation, an MTA sweetheart deal for the Vanderbilt rail yards, and hundreds of millions in New York taxpayer subsidies and government breaks wants to become...the President of Russia*. (*Yes, we readily admit that we are not experts on Russian politics, and are certainly not stumping for Putin. So what this all means in
Russia is a whole other story though we do think it is important to note how and where Mr. Prokhorov made his big splash into the American cultural and corporate consciousness.)
MOSCOW — Amid a crescendo of complaints from Russians fed up with the country's tightly controlled political system, two prominent figures — a billionaire industrialist and the recently ousted finance minister — sought to fill a void in the opposition leadership on Monday.
The billionaire, Mikhail D. Prokhorov, who owns shares in a major gold mining company and an array of other ventures in Russia as well as the New Jersey Nets basketball franchise in the United States, said he would run for president, challenging Prime Minister Vladimir V. Putin.
"I made a decision, probably the most serious decision in my life: I am going to the presidential election," Mr. Prohkorov said at a news conference. He has barely appeared in public since mid-September, when he was removed as the head of a pro-business party, Just Cause, after clashing with Kremlin political strategists.
"You may remember, the Kremlin removed me and my allies from Just Cause, and we were not allowed to do what we wanted," he said. "It is not in my nature to stop halfway. So for the last two and a half months we sat and worked, very calmly and quietly, and we created all the infrastructure to collect two million signatures," the number needed to get on the ballot as an independent candidate. ...
For Mr. Prokhorov, whose business interests include a stake in the Atlantic Yards development in downtown [sic] Brooklyn, his leap into presidential politics could be risky. He is the first wealthy businessman to pursue a political goal in Russia against the governing authorities since the 2003 arrest of Mikhail B. Khodorkovsky, the former chairman of the Yukos Oil Company, who was jailed after he began financing an opposition party. He remains in prison. ...
The organization that promised to deliver jobs for black supporters of Atlantic Yards has received hundreds of thousands of dollars from developer Bruce Ratner to help train workers for the positions — but has only secured work for 15 people at the $5-billion mega-project.
The mostly black members of Brooklyn United for Innovative Local Development who were promised some of the 1,500 jobs per year over the project's 10-year buildout loudly supported Atlantic Yards during the approval process, often appearing in hard hats at rallies and hearings and presenting a contrasting face to the project's mostly white opponents.
BUILD's President James Caldwell said that the group has helped 400 people find work around town — but he admitted that only 15 of those positions were on Ratner's Prospect Heights development, which currently consists of only the under-construction Barclays Center near the corner of Flatbush and Atlantic avenues.
Residents filed a lawsuit against Ratner and BUILD last Tuesday in federal court, claiming that executives at BUILD and Ratner's company falsely promised them union memberships and jobs in exchange for completing a "sham" 15-week training program run by the Downtown nonprofit in 2010.
Caldwell disputed the claim, and blamed his failure to secure more Atlantic Yards jobs for local residents on the economy and lawsuits from Yards opponents.
"There would be [more jobs] had all these things not taken place," he said. "The bottom fell out of the economy."
But the Great Recession didn't hurt BUILD's bottom line: the organization's annual operating budget increased from $191,721 in 2007 to $279,395 in 2009, according to the latest available documents from the Internal Revenue Service...
Sorry, but opposition to the project has nothing whatsoever to do with the project’s failure to create jobs. For two years Forest City Ratner has had completely unimpeded rights to construct its project and if BUILD has only been able to provide 15 Atlantic Yards jobs (out of some 400 or so on site) that too has nothing to do with opposition.
The fact that Reverend Daughtry bought into the developer's job hype, partnered with Ratner and ignored any concerns, criticism and warnings about the project is his own responsibility.
Hamill asks Sanna, "What was the first thing he had to do to erect this 18,000 seat arena?" Hamill allows Sanna to blithely respond, without challenge, "Demolish 52 buildings. We did that in sections, starting at Atlantic Ave, as politics played out and tenants vacated. Then we start carving away at the land."
Spoken like a true tin pot dictator. Politics didn't "play out," it was a fixed political deal. And tenants weren't "vacated," they were removed by eminent domain condemnation.
But
Sanna's language isn't all that's slippery. See Hamill didn't bother to note that while Sanna as a Brooklyn native is excited to play his part in the Atlantic Yards land grab, he is an outspoken hypocrite NIMBY in New Jersey. Here, in full, is NoLandGrab from November 17th:
What's good for Brooklyn is apparently not good for Forest City Ratner's head of construction's own neighborhood.
Group says 'Look at the figures' The Item of Millburn and Short Hills
by Lindsey Kelleher
Supporters of the Concerned Neighborhood Association argue that the infrastructure on the corner of Jefferson Avenue and Old Short Hills Road isn't big enough to support the proposed synagogue that Rabbi Mendel Bogomilsky wants to build there.
And Robert Sanna, a trustee for the association, noted that constructing a synagogue on this property, which is 1.8 acres, could set a precedent for building other institutions such as shelters, day care centers or hospitals on property lots that are too small to accommodate them. Current township regulations require 3 acres of land for building a house of worship.
State-licensed architect Michael Soriano from Cornerstone Architectural Group LLC was hired by the Concerned Neighborhood Association's attorney Kevin Coakley to show the Millburn Zoning Board of Adjustment how many people could fit inside the Chai Center under the International Building Code New Jersey Edition.
...
The Item previously reported that some people in favor of the Chai Center find it ironic that Sanna is against zoning exceptions in his Jefferson Avenue neighborhood but is employed with Forest City Ratner Corporation, a development company in New York. Sanna noted to both The Item and at the Oct. 31 hearing that his occupation is not relevant to the synagogue application.
NoLandGrab: But Sanna's own unvarnished, hypocritical NIMBYism is relevant to us! He doesn't seem to have a problem with a state override of city zoning for Atlantic Yards, the sweeping away of city rules forbidding the siting of an arena in a residential neighborhood, or the fact that (if his boss can hornswoggle the funds to build it) Atlantic Yards would be the densest residential tract in North America.
Posted: 11.26.11
Happy Thanksgiving 2011!
No gravy, again, this year, just Russian dressing (the gravy was used up on Forest City Ratner's taxpayer gravy train). Here we are, nearly eight years after Ratner announced his project, and all we know is that the developer is constructing the world's most expensive, money-losing arena he promised with no other promised "benefits" on the horizon (sure, this past week Forest City released renderings of 2 or 3 new buildings, and claimed they will use modular construction—though that seems like a ploy to gain union concessions, aka "union-busting"—but gave no definitive details on a groundbreaking date for the first tower, which is already years behind schedule, and admitted to not having the financing to construct that first tower.)
Instead, we have 22 acres of developer's blight (though somehow a rusty arena facade is somehow a feature rather than a characteristic of blight).
On a more serious note, we offer our gratitude at this time of thanks giving to
all of our supporters over the past eight years and for those who, day by day, are learning more and more about Ratner's Folly at Flatbush.
We wish you and your loved ones a very happy holiday.
Forest City Ratner has releasedrenderings of their SHoP-designed high-rise condos for Atlantic Yards. And let's face it, assuming Ratner doesn't backtrack on the design yet again, the project resembles the same ho-hum, cookie-cutter vertical sprawl of a thousand-and-one other transit-oriented development boondoggles. But this one is even special-er, cus the business and modular-savvy of SHoP seems to have been put to good use for Ratner's union-busting scheme. As L Magazine writes:
The union workers who would be assembling the towers, in various factories, before they're stacked up, would stand to make less the half the hourly wage they could expect if the tower was constructed on-site. Forest City Ratner told the Times, "We are in the process of attempting to reach an agreement that will work for the building trades and Forest City in an effort to create permanent employment," because they are definitely trustworthy when it comes to delivering the jobs they'd long promised the community.
Someone, quick, please break-down what Bruce Ratner makes per-hour, given his $931,584.00 annual income. #FAILtecture
One wonders if the unions will let this happen, after all, Ratner has no choice but to build union.
Posted: 11.22.11
Atlantic Yards Documentary "Battle for Brooklyn" Shortlisted for Oscars
The critically acclaimed film by Brooklyn filmmakers Rumur (Mike Galinsky, Suki Hawley and David Beilinson) about the fight against the Atlantic Yards project, Battle for Brooklyn, has been shortlisted for an Oscar for Best Feature Documentary. The film is one of 15 shortlisted, out of 124 eligible films.
The press release from the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences:
Beverly Hills, CA (November 18, 2011) – The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences today announced that 15 films in the Documentary Feature category will advance in the voting process for the 84th Academy Awards®. One hundred twenty-four pictures had originally qualified in the category.
The 15 films are listed below in alphabetical order by title, with their production company:
"Battle for Brooklyn" (RUMUR Inc.)
"Bill Cunningham New York" (First Thought Films)
"Buck" (Cedar Creek Productions)
"Hell and Back Again" (Roast Beef Productions Limited)
"If a Tree Falls: A Story of the Earth Liberation Front" (Marshall Curry Productions, LLC)
"Jane's Journey" (NEOS Film GmbH & Co. KG)
"The Loving Story" (Augusta Films)
"Paradise Lost 3: Purgatory" (@radical.media)
"Pina" (Neue Road Movies GmbH)
"Project Nim" (Red Box Films)
"Semper Fi: Always Faithful" (Tied to the Tracks Films, Inc.)
"Sing Your Song" (S2BN Belafonte Productions, LLC)
"Undefeated" (Spitfire Pictures)
"Under Fire: Journalists in Combat" (JUF Pictures, Inc.)
"We Were Here" (Weissman Projects, LLC)
The Documentary Branch Screening Committee viewed all the eligible documentaries for the preliminary round of voting. Documentary Branch members will now select the five nominees from among the 15 titles on the shortlist.
The 84th Academy Awards nominations will be announced live on Tuesday, January 24, 2012, at 5:30 a.m. PT in the Academy's Samuel Goldwyn Theater.
Academy Awards for outstanding film achievements of 2011 will be presented on Sunday, February 26, 2012, at the Kodak Theatre at Hollywood & Highland Center®, and televised live by the ABC Television Network. The Oscar presentation also will be televised live in more than 200 countries worldwide.
Much of the media was in bright, shiny object mode reacting to Bruce Ratner and SHoP Architects release of a few new tower renderings to the New York Times.
Norman Oder has done more than react
to the bright, shiny rendered objects. He has dug deep and offered, believe it or not, continuity to the now eight-years-and-counting-developing story mostly characterized by bait-and-switches and broken promises.
Well, Forest City Ratner yesterday announced plans for Building 2, a 32-story, 350-unit tower with half subsidized apartments--the world's tallest modular tower--and the press piled on.
They just didn't answer all the questions.
Why were the renderings released yesterday?
No report explained that. There's no financing for the first building. The modular plan isn't final.
I'd bet that the release was strategized to deflect any lingering attention from the lawsuit filed two days earlier by construction workers charging they didn't get promised jobs and union cards after going through a selective training program mandated by the Atlantic Yards Community Benefit Agreement.
And to put pressure on construction unions. Remember, Ratner stopped building the Beekman Tower (aka 8 Spruce Street) midway to renegotiate with the unions.
What kind of pressure?
Well, Gary LaBarbera, president of the Building Building and Construction Trades Council, said, in a statement, "We are in the process of attempting to reach an agreement on modular construction that will work for the building trades and Forest City in an effort to create permanent employment opportunities for our members,"
Is Ratner definitely building modular?
Not at all. "We intend to do it modular," he told the Wall Street Journal, but said the decision isn't final. Indeed, you have to watch his language. In November 2009, after the state eminent domain decision, Ratner said they had the "intent" to move the New Jersey Nets to Brooklyn for the 2011-12 season.
Didn't the permit application describe a non-modular process?
Yup.
Did any press outlet mention that?
Not yet.
...
Does this announcement represent an about-face by Ratner? The Daily News said "project opponents saw another about-face by the developer." The Times quoted Council Member James, "who denounced what she described as the growing distance between the promise and the reality of Atlantic Yards."
It's another example of journalists pitting Ratner against "opponents" and maintaining what Jay Rosen calls the "View from Nowhere," the false middle, the inability to do any analysis. Actually, Bruce Ratner said it himself, that "existing incentives" don't work for high-rise, union-built affordable housing.
He said that?
Yup. Of course, he proposed--and the state approved--high-rise, union-built affordable housing.
Does that mean all the promises about Atlantic Yards residential rental towers, and the approval of those promises, were bogus?
The project's planned 6,400 apartments—and particularly the 2,250 units pledged for low- and middle-income tenants—were a key selling point for the development when it was approved by the state over neighborhood criticism in 2006. It was later stalled by lawsuits contesting the use of eminent domain, and then slowed by the economic downturn.
Now Forest City has told government officials that the high proportion of affordable apartments has made it difficult to make the economics work for the towers, despite a surprisingly strong rebound in the rental market.
Previously, the company asked the city for additional subsidy to make the first Atlantic Yards tower move forward, to no avail.
Mr. Ratner said Thursday that the existing incentives for developments where half the units are priced for middle- and low-income tenants "don't work for a high-rise building that's union built."
He added that he had "accepted the fact that we're not going to get more subsidy."
(Emphasis added.)
Well, in 2003, 2006, 2009, 2010 and 2011 Forest City Ratner proposed, had approved and claimed that it would build half of its rental units as "affordable" with union labor. So what changed? Note that Ratner did no say that the changed economy is the reason his approved plan doesn't work or that the existing incentives today are different than what they were when the project was proposed and approved.
What changed? Just the candor that the project has proposed, hyped and approved was never feasible from the start. But government, Ratner and ESDC were warned that the project was not financially feasible. Norman Oder, looking at the same "stunning" remark from Ratner writes:
...The state approved Ratner's revised proposal in 2009, with a report by KPMG saying that yes, it was plausible to build out the project in ten years, thanks mainly to the demand for subsidized housing. KPMG's report was questionable mainly for its unrealistic estimates regarding the condo market, not the market for mixed-income rentals.
The warning
The state was on notice. A 2009 report by the Kahr Real Estate Group, commissioned by the Council of Brooklyn Neighborhoods, warned:
It is extremely unlikely that the full project can be financed and completed within 10 years at a profit by a private sector developer without substantial subsidies in excess of what has already been currently proposed.
That's exactly what Ratner admitted today and why he's seeking concessions from unions and/or building modular.
Two years ago, did anyone official heed the warning? No.
"Different opinions," Empire State Development Corporation (ESDC) Senior Counsel Steve Matlin said dismissively on 9/17/09, contrasting the KPMG study with the more pessimistic Kahr report.
Today, likely to deflect from a federal lawsuit filed two days ago, Forest City Ratner has released new renderings of the first towers the developer hopes one day to put up, and has confirmed, sorta maybe, that the towers will be done with modular, pre-fab construction. Notably, where once Tower 1 was to break ground this year, then was shifted to early 2012, now Ratner says maybe in the spring....yet, according to the Post, there is no financing.
Mr. Ratner, chief executive of Forest City Ratner, said that prefabrication or modular construction could save time and cut construction costs by as much as 25 percent.
So, if construction costs are cut 25% will Ratner cut rents and income eligibility for the "affordable" units accordingly? Surely the project's sponsors at the ESDC, the Cuomo Adminstration, Mayor Bloomberg, Bertha Lewis and pols who enthusiastically supported the project's "affordable" housing will demand this. Right?
To City Council Member Letitia James, the leading political opponent of Atlantic Yards, the federal lawsuit filed yesterday by seven would-be Atlantic Yards workers, who claim they were promised construction jobs and union cards after finishing a highly competitive training program, confirms that the project “was the greatest bait and switch in the history of Brooklyn.”
For the workers-- some of whom quit jobs or declined job offers in expectation of post-training work and union membership--it was simply a chance for justice, after going through the 15-week program sponsored by Community Benefits Agreement (CBA) signatory BUILD (Brooklyn United for Innovative Local Development), where they learned little and were put to work, without pay, on a mostly unsupervised contracting job.
“We were repeatedly reassured on numerous occasions that all we had to do is to complete the program and we would obtain union books and employment,” said Kathleen Noreiga, 58, an electrician (in video below). She made a point of saying she had rallied for the project with BUILD, which, while offering job training and assistance, has regularly brought Atlantic Yards supporters to public hearings and events. (BUILD CEO James Caldwell has regularly praised Atlantic Yards developer Bruce Ratner as "like an angel sent from God.")
Seven of the 36 workers who went through the program, which concluded last December, joined the suit, announced at a press conference yesterday afternoon. (Videos by Jonathan Barkey)
“I was robbed,” asserted Maurice Griffin (in video below), who quit his non-union carpentry job to do the 15-week, Forest City Ratner-funded program that began last August.
“They guaranteed me a union card, They said it’s not a question of whether we have it, but whether you complete the program. And I completed it. I came every time, early. I did my work. I’m here to let everybody know I’m not going to stand for this.” Griffin later joined a union on his own.
"Not only was I lied to, and my classmates, but Brooklyn was lied to," added plaintiff Clarence Stewart (in first video), saying the students were told they would work on the project but instead were offered jobs at McDonalds. "He basically stole Brooklyn, and every time I pass by the arena, it makes me sick and appalled."
The plaintiffs are suing for both back wages, based on unpaid construction work, as well as likely more significant sums regarding alleged deceptive practices regarding expected union memberships and jobs at the project. The suit seeks both compensatory and punitive damages
The Pre-Apprenticeship Training Program (PATP) was required under the CBA, signed in June 2005, but not delivered until more than five years later:
Commencing upon execution of this Agreement, Developers and BUILD shall initiate and coordinate a job training program to train Community residents for construction jobs within the Arena and Project...
(Emphasis added)
"It is sadly something we can all agree on: we were all stiffed," said state Senator Velmanette Montgomery, in a statement read by staffer Jim Vogel. "I applaud them for standing up and saying what was done to them was wrong." ...
Continue reading and watching for more about the suit, its back story, and BUILD's defense at the post press conference scrum. While BUILD mounted a vigourous defense at the press conference, the only defense against the serious and documented allegations will be the one mounted in court. And Norman Oder wonders, rightfully, who will pay for BUILD's defense if its benefactor Forest City Ratner decides it is a cost it cannot truck.
Tonight at 6pm the Cardozo Real Estate Law Association presents a screening of Battle for Brooklyn followed by a panel discussion including, for the first time, both Daniel Goldstein and Matthew Brinckerhoff:
Daniel Goldstein, co-founder of Develop Don't Destroy Brooklyn (DDDB), the film's protagonist and lead plaintiff on the eminent domain lawsuit at the core of the film;
Matthew Brinckerhoff, Emery, Celli, Brinckerhoff & Abady, DDDB legal counsel and attorney for the Atlantic Yards eminent domain case;
Michael Galinsky, Co-Director (with Suki Hawley) of "Battle for Brooklyn," partner of Rumur Films;
Steven Polivy, Chair, Economic Development & Incentives Practice, Akerman Senterfitt LLP.
The film and panel discussion are free and open to the public. An RSVP is required. RSVP here.
Details below:
The Cardozo Real Estate Law Association Presents:
Battle for Brooklyn
A Film Screening and Panel Discussion about the Atlantic Yards and Public Private Development Challenges
WHEN:
Wednesday, November 16th
Film Start - 6:00pm Sharp (Run Time 93 minutes) and Panel Discussion 7:45pm
WHERE:
Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law
55 Fifth Avenue. Room 424
(Map)
Snacks and Light Refreshments will be provided.
The video clip below is from Battle for Brooklyn. The clip is a response to a reporter's question about whether the Atlantic Yards Community Benefit Agreement (CBA) is legally binding, Mayor Michael Bloomberg answers, "You have Bruce Ratner's word. That should be enough for you and everybody else in this community."
You gotta see it to believe it:
Apparently Bruce Ratner's word isn't enough. Go figure.
What
would Atlantic Yards Look like?... Photo
Simulations
Before and After views from around the project footprint
revealing the massive scale of the proposed luxury apartment
and sports complex.